Saturday, January 15, 2011

PFA RULINGS IN FAVOUR OF PROSECUTION -PART-II

20
P&H  H.C-2001(2) FAC 218
It was the duty of vendor to have stirred the milk & homogenized it before giving sample.

21
S.C.- 2002(2) FAC 105
Curd – in the absence of any explanation- curd to be treated as prepared from B.Milk.
22
S.C. 2002(2) FAC 81
Minimum sentence prescribed cannot be reduced.
23
Gujarat H.C.-2002(2) FAC 27
Suitable containers – application of mind-it is for the accused to keep the food clean.

24
Bombay H.C.-2003 FAJ 156& Also in        2002 FAC 44
S.17(2)-Filing of nomination at manufacturing place not enough.
25
M.P. H.C- 1992(2) FAC 232
1)Delay in Prosecution- Accused not opted for sending sample to CFL-Petitioner  cannot contend that he is prejudicied.
2)Panch witness turned hostile-testimony of the F.I. to be relied.
26
Punjab H.C-1992(2) FAC272
Sale to F.I. is a sale.
27
M.P. H.C- 1992(2) FAC 85
Non-compliance of R.9(a) is not fatal
28
M.P. H.C- 1992(2) FAC 276
Sale to F.I.-Neither the Prop. Nor the servant made any statement to F.I. that  sample was taken from the stock of the customers-defence version  only an after thought.
29
MAD.H.C-1984 L.W.Crl.244
Institution-meaning-date of cognizance, relevant- not date of occurrence.
30
S.C.-M.L.J(Crl) 2000-P.828
CFL report supersedes-Proceeding to continue without fresh consent.
31
S.C.-Mad. L.J.(Crl)-2000-P.48
S.311 Cr.P.C. can be invoked at any stage of trial
32
S.C.-A.I.R.-1992.S.C.1121
Corroboration of Ind. Witness not necessary.
33
G.O.880.Dt.13.03.58 Health
Declaration of Local Area
34
G.O.Ms.No.235/Health/3.2.65
Local Authority – Defn.
35

G.O.Ms.No.2722/H&FW/19.10.76

Appointment of LHA
36

Lr.No.133859/PFA/03Dt.1.12.03

LHA in Mplts. Without H.O. & in absence of H.O.
37

Lr.R.No.7300/04/J4/9.3.04/CMA

                        -do-
38

G.O.(3D)No.17 Dt.14.2.94/Home

A.P.P. to conduct PFA Cases
40

G.O. No.3591,Health,Education &L.Admn Dept(Health) /26.11.55

Appointment of F.I. in Municipalities.
41

G.O.146/H&FW Dept./31.7.02

Appointment of F.I. – Amendment.
42
AIR 1975 S.C.1309
1.S.20A-Power of court to implead manufacturer
2.Distributor can be prosecuted U/s.7,14&2(xiii)
3.Joint trial of vendor &distributor or manufacturer. Distributor or manufacturer can be joined as co-accused.
43
1996 Crl .L.J. 424
Joint trial of vendor, distributor permissible.

No comments: